Tue 21 Nov, 2017

Low-carbon infrastructure by contrast, whether it's new rail routes, energy efficient housing or renewable energy, is designed to last, and will sustain employment. Mark Ruskell MSP

The Scottish Government is failing to heed expert advice to allocate 70 per cent of its capital spending to low-carbon infrastructure projects, analysis by the Scottish Green MSPs shows.

Ahead of this week's UK Budget, which will affect Scottish Ministers' capital spending, the Greens are warning that of Scottish infrastructure projects underway, less than 28 per cent are low-carbon, such as electrification of the Edinburgh-Glasgow rail service. Almost 51 per cent of projects underway are high-carbon, such as the expansion of the M8-M73-M74 motorways.

And of projects being programmed, less than 26 per cent are low-carbon, such as energy efficiency measures in housing, while almost 40 per cent are high-carbon, such as the dualling of the A9 and A96.

Scotland's Low Carbon Infrastructure Task Force has previously highlighted international research showing that to meet the goal of keeping global temperature rise below 2 degrees Celsius, 72 per cent of public infrastructure investment should be directed at low-carbon projects.

Mark Ruskell MSP, Climate & Energy spokesperson for the Scottish Greens, said:

"We all stand to lose by locking in high-carbon spending as it will worsen rather than tackle the climate crisis and do nothing to provide economic stability. Low-carbon infrastructure by contrast, whether it's new rail routes, energy efficient housing or renewable energy, is designed to last, and will sustain employment.

"The private sector, public bodies and charities involved in Scotland's Low Carbon Task Force all agree that low-carbon investment contributes to economic progress and resilience, boosts local business, provides health benefits and cuts fuel poverty. The Scottish Government is missing these opportunities by taking too long to make the shift to the clean economy we all know is needed.

"Green MSPs were mandated at our party conference last month to make the case for 70 per cent capital spend on low-carbon, and we must aim to reach that figure by the end of this parliament. There's still time for ministers to be bolder ahead of them publishing the draft Scottish budget in three weeks' time."

Get involved

More like this

Three key tests our MSPs will apply before deciding whether to support or oppose the Budget

Sun 21 Jan, 2018

Patrick Harvie MSP, Co-convener of the Scottish Greens, today (21 Jan) outlined three key tests that the Green MSPs will apply before deciding whether to support or oppose a revised 2018-19 Budget from the minority SNP Government.

Last Wednesday (17 Jan), SNP MSPs supported a Green debate amendment at Holyrood, calling for changes to the draft budget to improve local council funding, public sector workers' pay and low-carbon infrastructure. The government is under pressure to present any revisions ahead of the Stage One vote on the Budget Bill at the end of this month.

SNP Climbdown On Draft Budget Shows Greens Leading The Change

Wed 17 Jan, 2018

Following tonight’s vote at Holyrood, in which SNP MSPs voted to accept Green changes to the Scottish Budget on public services, workers’ pay and low-carbon infrastructure, Green MSP Patrick Harvie said:

"Tonight’s climbdown by the SNP shows they accept that their draft budget cannot command support in Parliament, and they have accepted our view that changes are needed to protect public services, improve frontline workers’ pay and invest in low-carbon capital projects.

Harvie says analysis shows ministers have work to do on council funding and pay

Mon 18 Dec, 2017

Patrick Harvie MSP, Finance spokesperson for the Scottish Greens, said today's (18 Dec) draft budget analysis by the impartial Scottish Parliament Information Centre (SPICe) shows ministers have serious work to do on council funding and pay if they want support from the Green MSPs.

The SPICe analysis shows:

*The Local Government Finance Circular shows Total Revenue falling by 1.6% in real terms, or £157.3m.

*Councils could potentially raise an additional £77m, if all 32 raised Council Tax by the maximum 3%.