Sun 14 Jan, 2018

Brian Finlay

After reading Paul Hutcheon’s interesting interview with Tory MSP Annie Wells on her experiences of homophobic bullying I felt both sympathetic and angry simultaneously (Meet the working-class girl from Glasgow who was bullied at school for being gay and became the nicest Tory in Hollywood). I can understand and relate to some of the torment she endured at school as I too am a gay person. I was lucky not to experience homophobic abuse and bullying to the same extent but have some LGBTIQ friends who had similar experiences to her. Like Annie Wells, I did feel confused; I had that feeling of being different from the “typical” boys.

I share her enthusiasm for the TIE (Time for Inclusive Education) programme and hope this brings about change for all LGBTIQ students and improves their experience in the Scottish education system. I do however find Annie Wells’s political alignment with the Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party mind-boggling. During the 1980s, the attitude of the UK Conservative Party towards the LGBTIQ population at large was disgusting.

Yes, the Conservatives often bleat about being the “party of equality” and they did introduce the Marriage (Same-Sex Couples) Act 2013 under the coalition with the Liberals Democrats under David Cameron. However, the demonisation of the LGBTIQ community during the time Annie Wells was experiencing dreadful treatment at school was essentially being facilitated by the Conservative Party. Section 28 of the Local Government Act 1988 was introduced by Margaret Thatcher’s government, banning any local authorities, such as schools, from “promoting homosexuality”. This silenced any discussion of the LGBTIQ community in the school curriculum and alienated any students who may feel confused or identified as LGBTIQ. The Conservative Party’s attitude towards the “promotion of homosexuality” was not liberal or accepting during the whole of the 1980s.

I understand parties can change and develop but when the Marriage (Same-Sex Couples) Act 2013 was debated and voted for in The House of Commons, around half of the Conservatives, including some Government ministers, voted against the Act. In Scotland, around half of Conservative MSPs voted against the Marriage and Civil Partnership Bill, including some who sit alongside Annie Wells in the chamber today; namely Murdo Fraser and Liz Smith. Moreover, just three months ago, her party went into a supply and confidence deal with the DUP, who refuse to allow LGBTIQ individuals to marry the person they love, where they hold the balance of power, in Northern Ireland. I find it astonishing that Annie Wells would even want to vote for the Scottish Conservatives and Unionist Party let alone represent them proudly within the Scottish Parliament. I respect her position on the Union, her driving force for getting involved in politics, but does that really outweigh her priorities and make her simply accept that the party she represents essentially contributed to her horrific experience as a young LGBTIQ individual?

Originally printed in the Sunday Herald -13th of August 2017

Get involved

More like this

GREEN CONCERNS OVER NO SNOW DAY FOR SLC FACILITIES STAFF

Wed 7 Mar, 2018

South Lanarkshire Greens have raised concerns after hearing complaints by SLC Facility staff that they have had to come in to work in schools on the recent severe weather warning days, despite police warnings stating that the public should only travel if absolutely essential, due to a risk to life. This is despite the fact that children and teachers throughout South Lanarkshire were given three 'snow days' off from Wednesday to Friday last week as schools closed.

Are the left wing of the SNP better aligned to the Scottish Green Party?

Brian Finlay Sun 28 Jan, 2018

Ask any Scottish Green Party (SGP) activist and they will tell you that we get the usual “I vote SNP so we can get independence” or “I support the Greens but we need to get independence first” rhetoric. The SNP receive the largest share of the pro-independence vote but a huge chunk of their voters are on the left of the party’s policies and political position of ‘centre-left’. It could be asserted that these voters would be better placed aligning themselves with the SGP who have ambitious policy to eradicate poverty and land ownership to name just two.

Universal Basic Income: tackling inequality and the automation of work….

Brian Finlay Thu 18 Jan, 2018

I am happy to read more positive coverage of Universal Basic Income (UBI) especially links with the current state of the economy and work as a solution to our problems. I write about this topic as it has had a huge amount of coverage mostly positive, apart from The Times writer Kenny Farquharson who labelled UBI as ‘state pocket money’, in most papers and political blogs.